7/31/2023 0 Comments Prognostic study![]() Finlay, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, 1 and R. Buckle, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, 1 D. Spencer, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, 2, 3 P. Keeley, Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, 5 K. Griffiths, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, 2, 3 V. Todd, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, 2, 3, 4 J. Kalpakidou, Data curation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, 1 C. Vickerstaff, Formal analysis, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, 1 A. Stone, Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, 1, * V. Library of Medicine (NLM) in partnership with The The BMJ team is based mainly in London,Īlthough we also have editors elsewhere in Europe and in the US.ĭigitization of the British Medical Journal and its forerunners We aim to helpĭoctors to make better decisions. Professionals in ways that will improve outcomes for patients. Our mission is to lead the debate on healthĪnd to engage, inform, and stimulate doctors, researchers, and other health ![]() ![]() The BMJ's vision is to be the world's most influentialĪnd widely read medical journal. Readers for research articles, nor for other articles arising from work fundedīy open access grants. With open access and no limits on word counts. The website is updatedĭaily with the BMJ's latest original research, education, news, and commentĪrticles, as well as podcasts, videos, and blogs.Īll the BMJ's original research is published in full on bmj.com, Means that all articles appear on bmj.com beforeīeing included in an issue of the print journal. Our publishing model–"continuous publication"– The BMJ is an international peer reviewed medical journal andĪ fully "online first" publication. Interventions based on clinical guidance that, supports individualised management decisions might improve access and outcomes. Not receiving appropriate angiography was associated with a higher risk of coronary events in all groups. Conclusions: At an early stage after presentation with suspected angina, coronary angiography is underused in older people, women, south Asians, and people from deprived areas. Not undergoing angiography when it was deemed appropriate was associated with higher rates of coronary event. Results: In a multivariable analysis, angiography was less likely to be performed in patients aged over 64 compared with those aged under 50 (hazard ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.38 to 0.96), women compared with men (0.42, 0.35 to 0.50), south Asians compared with white people (0.48, 0.34 to 0.67), and patients in the most deprived fifth compared with the other four fifths (0.66, 0.40 to 1.08). Main outcome measures: Receipt of angiography (420 procedures) coronary mortality and acute coronary syndrome events. Participants: 1375 consecutive patients in whom coronary angiography was individually rated as appropriate with the Rand consensus method. Setting: Six ambulatory care clinics in England. Design: Multicentre cohort with five year follow-up. Objectives: To determine whether coronary angiography for suspected stable angina pectoris is underused in older patients, women, south Asian patients, and those from socioeconomically deprived areas, and, if it is, whether this is associated with higher coronary event rates.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |